Reviewing a translation is technical work

Machine translation can draft a lesson in seconds. It cannot decide whether a sentence about specificity is still true in another language.

Reviewing a translation is technical work cover illustration

Localization is not a find-and-replace step at the end of publishing. It is a technical review that happens alongside the English source, with the same standards for accuracy.

What a translation reviewer checks

  • Terminology: does “element” mean the same thing in this language as in the spec?
  • Code: are identifiers, attribute names and error messages left untouched?
  • Direction: does the layout still work when the language reads right-to-left?
  • Examples: are names, addresses and currency localised or intentionally neutral?
  • Freshness: did the source change after this translation was approved?

Why we ship English and Bengali first

A small number of deeply reviewed locales is more useful than dozens of shallow ones. English and Bengali are our first release pair. Every additional locale needs reviewers, not just a translation file.

The implementation uses a locale registry, stable lesson IDs, a persisted language preference and a visible English fallback. Adding a language is an editorial decision, not a database migration.

Something to add?

Corrections and technical review are welcome. Tell us what we missed.

Send a correction